Diagnostic capabilities of large language models in the detection of scaphoid fractures in the emergency department

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scaphoid fractures account for 60%-70% of wrist traumas, with delayed diagnosis leading to avascular necrosis and functional impairment. Traditional radiographic assessment remains challenging due to anatomical complexity and overlapping structures. This study evaluated three next-generation large language models (LLMs) (ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.0, and Claude 3.5) for their ability to detect scaphoid fractures and determine surgical indications. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted at Ankara Etlik City Hospital (October 2022 – January 2025) including 300 patients (150 with computed tomography confirmed (CT-confirmed) scaphoid fractures and 150 without fractures), aged 18-65 years, who presented to the emergency department (ED) with wrist trauma. Three-view wrist radiographs were presented to each LLM on three separate days. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using overall accuracy (all three responses correct), strict accuracy (≥2 correct responses), and ideal accuracy (≥1 correct response). Response consistency was evaluated using Fleiss' kappa coefficient. Surgical indications were determined based on fracture displacement criteria. RESULTS: Claude 3.5 demonstrated superior sensitivity (57.1%) compared to Gemini 2.0 (18.2%) and ChatGPT-4o (9.1%) for fracture detection (p<0.001). Ideal accuracy rates were 79.3%, 36.0%, and 17.3%, respectively. Specificity remained uniformly low across models (43.1%-43.8%). All models performed better in non-fracture cases, with ideal accuracy exceeding 83%. Response consistency was moderate for all models (κ=0.36-0.41). For surgical indication assessment, Claude 3.5 identified 37.0% of cases requiring surgery, compared to ChatGPT-4o (34.1%) and Gemini 2.0 (24.4%), with correct determination rates of 73.7%, 71.4%, and 80.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Current LLMs demonstrate insufficient diagnostic accuracy for independent clinical use in scaphoid fracture detection. Claude 3.5's 57.1% sensitivity indicates that these technologies require substantial improvement before clinical deployment. However, their moderate performance in surgical decision-making suggests potential utility as assistive tools when combined with specialist expertise. Further development focusing on musculoskeletal-specific training is essential.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bulut, B., Yortanlı, M., Gür, A., Öz, M. A., & Mutlu, H. (2025). Diagnostic capabilities of large language models in the detection of scaphoid fractures in the emergency department. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 31(10), 987–994. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2025.98680

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free