Abstract
This article examines global extractivisms and transformative alternatives; addressing: (1) access to and control over resources, (2) governance and recognition, (3) environmental-social harms, and (4) justice. The examination of these themes provides an understanding of the sociospatial links between extractivism and differentiated distribution of benefits and burdens. The study sheds light on the politics of recognition, including the discourses and policies that enable extractive industries to obtain licences to operate in resource-rich territories. The analysis illuminates the inseparability of environmental-social impacts of extractivism, including altered human-nonhuman relations, while opening perspectives to claims for justice and the search for transformative alternatives.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Nygren, A., Kröger, M., & Gills, B. (2022). Global extractivisms and transformative alternatives. Journal of Peasant Studies, 49(4), 734–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2069495
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.