Abstract
In this paper I take up the "claim to universality" of hermeneutics, as put forth by Hans-Georg Gadamer; the aim is to grasp the "life that can understand," to grasp it in its essence and in terms of understanding. In this way I deal critically with Gadamer's (and Heidegger's) idea that all understanding is "self-understanding" and work out the dependence of understanding on the other, on the "hermeneutic object" (Gegenstand) of understanding. But a "hermeneutic object" (Gegenstand) is not a "mere object" (Objekt). On the basis of this distinction, I develop, in conclusion, a critical reflection on the selfobjectification of the human in those interpretations of human life that are oriented solely to natural science. Self-objectfication is a wrongly directed understanding and can therefore be corrected on the basis of a developed concept of life as understanding. © 2004 ? 2004 Brill Academic Publishers.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Figal, G. (2004). Life as understanding. Research in Phenomenology, 34(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569164042404491
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.