Abstract
After this article [1] was published, several issues came to light. Specifically: • In Fig 2, the lower portion of the ‘N’ panel for patient 2 appears similar to the upper portion of the ‘N’ panel for patient 3. The authors provided a corrected version of Fig 2 that includes replacement data for patient 2 from the original experiment. Underlying data for Fig 2 are in S1 File with this notice. • Similarities were noted between the p21 blots in Fig 6C and Fig 7C, and between the data in lane 2 of these p21 panels and lane 1 of the p21 blot in Fig 4C. Fig 4 reports overexpression experiments conducted in SMMC-7721 cells, and Figs 6 and 7 report knockdown experiments conducted in SMMC-7721 and BEL-7402 cells, respectively. The authors provided raw image data to support these figure panels (S2, S3 and S4 Files) and commented that errors were made in preparing Figs 6 and 7 due to the large amount of data and similarities between the p21 blots for the three experiments. The raw images provided did not appear to match the published figure panels in some cases; the authors stated that some of the original data are no longer available, for those results they provided replicate data from the same set of experiments. Updated versions of Figs 6 and 7 are provided here. The authors stated that the p21, Numb, and GAPDH data reported in each updated figure are from the same internal experiment. • Similarities were noted between the anti-BrdU immunofluorescence images shown in Fig 6D for SMMC-7721 cells and in Fig 7D for BEL-7402 cells. The authors commented that the SMMC-7721 data were erroneously reported in Fig 7D. In the updated version of Fig 7 provided here, the correct images from the original BEL-7402 experiment are provided in panels C and D. The underlying data for Fig 6 and the corrected Fig 7 are in S3 and S4 Files. • The sense primer reported in [1] for Numb RT-PCR experiments does not appear to target NUMB. The authors noted that this reflects a reporting error and stated that the following primers were used in the NUMB RT-PCR reactions to amplify nucleotides 1602–2055 of the NM_001005745.1 transcript: ? Sense 5’- TTCCTCACCTCTCAGCCTGT-3’ ? Antisense 5’-GGTTGGTAGGGGAGGGATTA-3’ • The Chang Liver cell line used in this study has been reported as misidentified or contaminated [2–4]. The authors confirmed that this line has been found to be indistinguishable from HeLa cells. They stated that this cell line was used only as a control in [1] and that the main experimental results were obtained in SMMC-7721 and MEL-7402 cells. However, due (Figure Presented).
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Wu, J., Shen, S. L., Chen, B., Nie, J., & Peng, B. G. (2022, March 1). Erratum: Numb Promotes Cell Proliferation and Correlates with Poor Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (PLoS ONE (2014) 9:4 (e95849) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095849). PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265938
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.