MyoRing Treatment for Keratoconus: DIOPTEX PocketMaker vs Ziemer LDV for Corneal Pocket Creation

  • Daxer B
  • Mahmood H
  • Daxer A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the results of MyoRing implantation for keratoconus using two different techniques for corneal pocket creation. Materials and methods: Seven eyes suffering from keratoconus were treated using Ziemer LDV for corneal pocket creation and seven eyes suffering from keratoconus were treated using DIOPTEX PocketMaker for corneal pocket creation. Results: Both groups did not show any statistically significant difference, neither in the severity of the disease nor in the results. Conclusion: Ziemer LDV and DIOPTEX PocketMaker give equal results for MyoRing implantation for keratoconus.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Daxer, B., Mahmood, H., & Daxer, A. (2012). MyoRing Treatment for Keratoconus: DIOPTEX PocketMaker vs Ziemer LDV for Corneal Pocket Creation. International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases, 1(3), 151–152. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10025-1029

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free