Abstract
Purpose: To compare the results of MyoRing implantation for keratoconus using two different techniques for corneal pocket creation. Materials and methods: Seven eyes suffering from keratoconus were treated using Ziemer LDV for corneal pocket creation and seven eyes suffering from keratoconus were treated using DIOPTEX PocketMaker for corneal pocket creation. Results: Both groups did not show any statistically significant difference, neither in the severity of the disease nor in the results. Conclusion: Ziemer LDV and DIOPTEX PocketMaker give equal results for MyoRing implantation for keratoconus.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Daxer, B., Mahmood, H., & Daxer, A. (2012). MyoRing Treatment for Keratoconus: DIOPTEX PocketMaker vs Ziemer LDV for Corneal Pocket Creation. International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases, 1(3), 151–152. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10025-1029
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.