Experimental studies of magnetic reconnection

99Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Laboratory magnetic reconnection experiments have been performed for nearly 20 years. Elegant experiments by Stenzel and Gekelman [R. L. Stenzel and W. Gekelman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1055 (1979); W. Gekelman and R. L. Stenzel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2414 (1985)] focused on the measurement of field quantities with a single movable probe in a highly reproducible plasma. Observations included a very thin current sheet (on the order of c/ωpe), accelerated electrons, and whistler waves. The argon ions were unmagnetized in these experiments. Recent magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) experiments by Yamada and Ono have used merging plasmoids [M. Yamada, Y. Ono, A. Hayakawa, M. Katsurai, and F. W. Perkins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 721 (1990); Y. Ono, M. Yamada, T. Akao, T. Tajima, and R. Matsumoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3328 (1996)] and have measured three dimensional effects and ion acceleration. We have observed correlations between magnetic reconnection and energetic ion flow events with merging force free spheromaks at the Swarthmore Spheromak Experiment (SSX) [T. W. Kornack, P. K. Sollins, and M. R. Brown, Phys. Rev. E 58, R36 (1998)]. The reconnection layer is measured with linear and two dimensional probe arrays and ion flow is directly measured with a retarding grid energy analyzer. Flow has been measured both in the plane of the reconnection layer and out of the plane. The outflow velocity is nearly Alfvénic in the reconnection plane and the scale of the magnetic structures is consistent with collisionless reconnection theories (on the order of c/ωpi). Results from the two dimensional array show the formation of magnetic islands correlated with super-Alfvénic ions accelerated normal to the layer. © 1999 American Institute of Physics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brown, M. R. (1999). Experimental studies of magnetic reconnection. Physics of Plasmas, 6(5 I), 1717–1724. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.873430

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free