An Institutional Approach to the Management of Asymptomatic Chorioamnionitis-Exposed Infants Born ≥35 Weeks Gestation

4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Our newborn practice routinely treated asymptomatic chorioamnionitis-exposed infants born at 35 weeks gestation or greater with empiric antibiotics. Starting April 1, 2017, we implemented an algorithm of not treating, unless there was an abnormal clinical and/or laboratory evaluation. The goal of this quality improvement initiative was to reduce the percentage of chorioamnionitis-exposed infants treated with antibiotics (primary outcome measure) to <50%. Methods: We compared 123 chorioamnionitis-exposed infants born 1 year before implementation (pre-algorithm group, April 1, 2016, to March 31, 2017) with 111 born 1 year following implementation (post-algorithm group, April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2018). The primary outcome measure was analyzed monthly using a run chart. Results: The maternal and neonatal characteristics were similar between both groups. Significantly fewer infants in the post-algorithm group received antibiotics compared with the pre-algorithm group (4.5% versus 96.8%; P < 0.01). There were no differences in median hospital length of stay or incidence of neonatal intensive care unit admissions between both groups. There were no positive blood cultures or readmissions within 7 days for early-onset sepsis in either group. Conclusion: An institutional approach of monitoring chorioamnionitis-exposed infants with a clinical and laboratory evaluation decreased antibiotic utilization in the mother-baby unit by 95% without an increase in hospital length of stay, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, or readmissions for early-onset sepsis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chiruvolu, A., Petrey, B., Stanzo, K. C., & Daoud, Y. (2019). An Institutional Approach to the Management of Asymptomatic Chorioamnionitis-Exposed Infants Born ≥35 Weeks Gestation. In Pediatric Quality and Safety (Vol. 4, p. E238). Wolters Kluwer Health. https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000238

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free