Eff ectiveness of abbott binaxnow rapid antigen test for detection of sars-cov-2 infections in outbreak among horse racetrack workers, california, usa

9Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Abbott BinaxNOW rapid antigen test is cheaper and faster than real-time reverse transcription PCR (rRTPCR) for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. We compared BinaxNOW with rRT-PCR in 769 paired specimens from 342 persons during a coronavirus disease outbreak among horse racetrack workers in California, USA. We found positive percent agreement was 43.3% (95% CI 34.6%-52.4%), negative percent agreement 100% (95% CI 99.4%-100%), positive predictive value 100% (95% CI 93.5%-100%), and negative predictive value 89.9% (95% CI 87.5%-92.0%). Among 127 rRT-PCR-positive specimens, the 55 with paired BinaxNOW-positive results had a lower mean cycle threshold than the 72 with paired BinaxNOW-negative results (17.8 vs. 28.5; p<0.001). Of 100 specimens with cycle threshold <30, a total of 51 resulted in positive virus isolation; 45 (88.2%) of those were BinaxNOWpositive. Our comparison supports immediate isolation for BinaxNOW-positive persons and confi rmatory testing for negative persons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Surasi, K., Cummings, K. J., Hanson, C., Kate Morris, M., Salas, M., Seftel, D., … Wadford, D. A. (2021). Eff ectiveness of abbott binaxnow rapid antigen test for detection of sars-cov-2 infections in outbreak among horse racetrack workers, california, usa. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 27(11), 2761–2767. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2711.211449

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free