The Abbott BinaxNOW rapid antigen test is cheaper and faster than real-time reverse transcription PCR (rRTPCR) for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. We compared BinaxNOW with rRT-PCR in 769 paired specimens from 342 persons during a coronavirus disease outbreak among horse racetrack workers in California, USA. We found positive percent agreement was 43.3% (95% CI 34.6%-52.4%), negative percent agreement 100% (95% CI 99.4%-100%), positive predictive value 100% (95% CI 93.5%-100%), and negative predictive value 89.9% (95% CI 87.5%-92.0%). Among 127 rRT-PCR-positive specimens, the 55 with paired BinaxNOW-positive results had a lower mean cycle threshold than the 72 with paired BinaxNOW-negative results (17.8 vs. 28.5; p<0.001). Of 100 specimens with cycle threshold <30, a total of 51 resulted in positive virus isolation; 45 (88.2%) of those were BinaxNOWpositive. Our comparison supports immediate isolation for BinaxNOW-positive persons and confi rmatory testing for negative persons.
CITATION STYLE
Surasi, K., Cummings, K. J., Hanson, C., Kate Morris, M., Salas, M., Seftel, D., … Wadford, D. A. (2021). Eff ectiveness of abbott binaxnow rapid antigen test for detection of sars-cov-2 infections in outbreak among horse racetrack workers, california, usa. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 27(11), 2761–2767. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2711.211449
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.