Dynamic strategic social learning in nest-building zebra finches and its generalizability

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Animals often balance asocial and social information strategically, adjusting when and from whom they copy based on context. Yet the cognition driving this dynamic-and its broader implications-remains poorly understood. We tested whether zebra finches use a copy-if-dissatisfied strategy by manipulating the quality of their initial nest-building or reproductive experience, showing them a conspecific nest-builder and tracking subsequent material choices. Builder-males were more likely to choose the demonstrated 'social' material-particularly at first choice-if they had previously used low-quality material. Using cognitive modelling, we estimated how latent learning mechanisms shaped decisions, identifying two asocial and two social parameters. These estimates provide the first formal evidence for the cognitive mechanisms of nest building. Forward simulations informed-but not predetermined-by these parameters approximated observed behaviour, supporting their causal role. We then used these parameters in exploratory simulations to test how choices might shift under novel payoff contexts. We found that payoff structure-not (dis)satisfaction-was the primary driver of social material use, though higher rewards did not proportionally increase copying. These exploratory simulation results offer preliminary insight into mechanisms underlying material-use variation. Our study illustrates how computational modelling can robustly link behaviour to underlying learning mechanisms and probe the generalizability of animal cognition-a rarity in this field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Breen, A. J., Eckersley, T., Camacho-Alpízar, A., Lambert, C. T., Balasubramanian, G., Healy, S. D., … Guillette, L. M. (2025). Dynamic strategic social learning in nest-building zebra finches and its generalizability. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 292(2061). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.1508

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free