Long-Term Outcome of Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm After Endovascular or Open Repair

9Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been established as a standard treatment option for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (iAAA) and gained importance due to a lower perioperative mortality than open repair (OAR). However, whether this survival advantage can be maintained or if OAR is beneficial in terms of long-term complications and reinterventions remains questionable. Design: In this retrospective cohort study data from patients undergoing elective EVAR or OAR for iAAAs in the years 2010-2016 was analyzed. The patients were followed through 2018. Methods: In the propensity score matched cohorts the perioperative and long-term outcomes of the patients were assessed. We identified 20 683 patients undergoing elective iAAA repair (76.4% EVAR). The propensity matched cohorts included 4886 pairs of patients. Results: The perioperative mortality was 1.9% for EVAR and 5.9% for OAR (P =

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Epple, J., Svidlova, Y., Schmitz-Rixen, T., Böckler, D., Lingwal, N., & Grundmann, R. T. (2023). Long-Term Outcome of Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm After Endovascular or Open Repair. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 57(8), 829–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744231178130

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free