Randomized clinical trial of Lichtenstein's operation versus mesh plug for inguinal hernia repair

51Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Two of the most commonly used open prosthetic tension-free techniques for inguinal hernia repair are Lichtenstein's operation and the mesh plug repair. The technique of choice remains a subject of ongoing debate. The objective of the present investigation was to compare the two surgical procedures with respect to associated morbidity and recurrence rates. Methods: Five hundred and ninety-five patients with 700 primary or recurrent inguinal hernias were randomized to undergo either Lichtenstein's operation or mesh plug repair. The primary endpoint of the investigation was the recurrence rate 1 year after surgery. Secondary endpoints were perioperative complications and reoperation rates. Results: At 12-month follow-up, 597 hernia repairs (85.3 per cent) were evaluated. There were no significant differences regarding recurrence rates and perioperative complications. However, there was a significant difference in the overall reoperation rate between the two treatment groups, with 13 reoperations (4.2 percent) in the Lichtenstein group and four (1.4 per cent) in the mesh plug group (P = 0.047). Conclusion: Lichtenstein's operation and the mesh plug repair are comparable with respect to perioperative complications and recurrence rates. Copyright © 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Frey, D. M., Wildisen, A., Hamel, C. T., Zuber, M., Oertli, D., & Metzger, J. (2007). Randomized clinical trial of Lichtenstein’s operation versus mesh plug for inguinal hernia repair. British Journal of Surgery, 94(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5580

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free