The effects of a static magnetic field on bone formation around a sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched-treated titanium implant

29Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the bone formation around commercial sandblasted, large-grit, acidetched (SLA)-treated titanium implants with or without a neodymium magnet in a rabbit tibia through histomorphometric analysis. Commercial SLA-treated implants with or without neodymium magnets were placed in 10 rabbits. After incising the flat part of the rabbit's tibia and installation of the specimens of titanium implants, the nonmagnet group was stitched without magnet insertion. On the other hand, the magnet group was inserted with neodymium magnet, fixed with pattern resin, and stitched. At 3 and 6 weeks after surgery, the animals were sacrificed, and the specimens were obtained. Undecalcified specimens were prepared for histomorphometric analysis of the bone-to-implant contact ratio (BIC) and bone volume (BV). The histomorphometric findings of the cortical bone showed that the mean BVs of the magnet group (3 weeks, 75.99%; 6 weeks, 82.94%) were higher than those of the nonmagnet group (3 weeks, 74.58%; 6 weeks, 78.75%), but there were no significant differences between the 2 groups (P > .05). In the marrow bone, the mean BICs of the magnet group (3 weeks, 10.36%; 6 weeks, 10.41%) were higher than those of the nonmagnet group (3 weeks, 6.41%; 6 weeks, 7.36%). After 3 weeks of installation, there was a significant difference between the 2 groups (P < .05). In rabbit tibia, the SLA-treated titanium implants with a neodymium magnet can trigger faster early peri-implant bone formation than those without a magnet.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leesungbok, R., Ahn, S. J., Lee, S. W., Park, G. H., Kang, J. S., & Choi, J. J. (2013). The effects of a static magnetic field on bone formation around a sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched-treated titanium implant. Journal of Oral Implantology, 39(SPL.ISSUE1), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00101

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free