Abstract
Objective: In the era of SARS-CoV-2, the risk of infectious airborne aerosol generation during otolaryngologic procedures has been an area of increasing concern. The objective of this investigation was to quantify airborne aerosol production under clinical and surgical conditions and examine efficacy of mask mitigation strategies. Study Design: Prospective quantification of airborne aerosol generation during surgical and clinical simulation. Setting: Cadaver laboratory and clinical examination room. Subjects and Methods: Airborne aerosol quantification with an optical particle sizer was performed in real time during cadaveric simulated endoscopic surgical conditions, including hand instrumentation, microdebrider use, high-speed drilling, and cautery. Aerosol sampling was additionally performed in simulated clinical and diagnostic settings. All clinical and surgical procedures were evaluated for propensity for significant airborne aerosol generation. Results: Hand instrumentation and microdebridement did not produce detectable airborne aerosols in the range of 1 to 10 μm. Suction drilling at 12,000 rpm, high-speed drilling (4-mm diamond or cutting burs) at 70,000 rpm, and transnasal cautery generated significant airborne aerosols (P
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Workman, A. D., Jafari, A., Welling, D. B., Varvares, M. A., Gray, S. T., Holbrook, E. H., … Bleier, B. S. (2020). Airborne Aerosol Generation During Endonasal Procedures in the Era of COVID-19: Risks and Recommendations. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States), 163(3), 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820931805
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.