Evaluation of the Chemical Integrity of Beta-Lactam Antibiotics by Iodine-Based Assay

  • Salois A
  • Perez I
  • Palma E
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One of the major problems associated with the therapeutic application of β-lactam antibiotics is their significant instability [1]-[3]. Analogs from that group are easily degraded in aqueous solu-tions and in solid state, which happens predominantly as a result of β-lactam ring chemical de-gradation. Because of this, the chemical integrity of β-lactam antibiotics must be closely monitored to meet FDA requirements. The original iodometric method based on visual detection of the end products of beta-lactamase hydrolysis that has been used to test beta-lactamase activity [4] was modified to quantitatively assess the amount of degraded product in amoxicillin. A UV-visible spectrophotometric method has been used, focusing on the ability of the products from the de-gradation of β-lactam analogs to absorb iodine from bulk solution, resulting in a significant reduc-tion in the absorption spectra. Amoxicillin trihydrate tablets with different expiration dates and amoxicillin samples pre-loaded with known amounts of degraded amoxicillin have been used to generate a calibration curve and quantify the presence of degraded materials. Results show that the changes in the absorption spectra of iodine reagent directly correlate with the fraction of de-graded β-lactam antibiotics, such as amoxicillin, in commercial products. The proposed assay might be as close as one step from simpler and cheaper methods of quantitative analysis of de-graded β-lactam analogs, with estimated sensitivity in the range of 1% -2%, which is better than the current FDA requirements.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Salois, A., Perez, I., Palma, E., Goolish, E., & Griko, Y. (2015). Evaluation of the Chemical Integrity of Beta-Lactam Antibiotics by Iodine-Based Assay. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 03(11), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2015.311012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free