Abstract
RNN language models have achieved state-of-the-art perplexity results and have proven useful in a suite of NLP tasks, but it is as yet unclear what syntactic generalizations they learn. Here we investigate whether state-of-the-art RNN language models represent long-distance filler-gap dependencies and constraints on them. Examining RNN behavior on experimentally controlled sentences designed to expose filler-gap dependencies, we show that RNNs can represent the relationship in multiple syntactic positions and over large spans of text. Furthermore, we show that RNNs learn a subset of the known restrictions on filler-gap dependencies, known as island constraints: RNNs show evidence for wh-islands, adjunct islands, and complex NP islands. These studies demonstrates that state-of-the-art RNN models are able to learn and generalize about empty syntactic positions.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Wilcox, E., Levy, R., Morita, T., & Futrell, R. (2018). What do RNN Language Models Learn about Filler-Gap Dependencies? In EMNLP 2018 - 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP, Proceedings of the 1st Workshop (pp. 211–221). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w18-5423
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.