What do RNN Language Models Learn about Filler-Gap Dependencies?

127Citations
Citations of this article
154Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

RNN language models have achieved state-of-the-art perplexity results and have proven useful in a suite of NLP tasks, but it is as yet unclear what syntactic generalizations they learn. Here we investigate whether state-of-the-art RNN language models represent long-distance filler-gap dependencies and constraints on them. Examining RNN behavior on experimentally controlled sentences designed to expose filler-gap dependencies, we show that RNNs can represent the relationship in multiple syntactic positions and over large spans of text. Furthermore, we show that RNNs learn a subset of the known restrictions on filler-gap dependencies, known as island constraints: RNNs show evidence for wh-islands, adjunct islands, and complex NP islands. These studies demonstrates that state-of-the-art RNN models are able to learn and generalize about empty syntactic positions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilcox, E., Levy, R., Morita, T., & Futrell, R. (2018). What do RNN Language Models Learn about Filler-Gap Dependencies? In EMNLP 2018 - 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP, Proceedings of the 1st Workshop (pp. 211–221). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w18-5423

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free