Relationship between glycated haemoglobin levels and mean glucose levels over time

419Citations
Citations of this article
454Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: HbA1c, expressed as the percentage of adult haemoglobin that is glycated, is the most widely used measure of chronic glycaemia. Achieving near-normal HbA1c levels has been shown to reduce long-term complications and the HbA1c assay is recommended to determine whether treatment is adequate and to guide adjustments. However, daily adjustments of therapy are guided by capillary glucose levels (mmol/l). We determined the relationship between an accurate measure of mean glucose levels over time and the HbA1c level, and whether HbA1c can be expressed in the same units as self-monitoring results. Methods: Twenty-two participants with diabetes and three non-diabetic participants were included in this longitudinal observational study. Mean glucose levels were measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), which measures interstitial glucose levels every 5 min, for 12 weeks. Capillary measurements were obtained four times per day to confirm the accuracy of CGM. HbA1c was measured at baseline and every 4 weeks. Results: The HbA1c results at weeks 8 and 12 correlated strongly (r = 0.90) with the CGM results during the preceding 8 and 12 weeks. A curvilinear (exponential) relationship and a linear regression captured the relationship with similarly high correlations, which allowed transformation of HbA1c values to a calculated mean glucose level. Conclusions and interpretation: HbA1c correlates closely with a complete measure of average glycaemia over the preceding 8-12 weeks. The translation of HbA1c to an average glucose level for reporting and management purposes is feasible. © 2007 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nathan, D. M., Turgeon, H., & Regan, S. (2007). Relationship between glycated haemoglobin levels and mean glucose levels over time. Diabetologia, 50(11), 2239–2244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-007-0803-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free