III-defined concepts in chemistry: Rigid force constants vs. compliance constants as bond strength descriptors for the triple bond in diboryne

42Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In a recent publication, the interpretation of Braunschweig's diboryne NHC-BB-NHC as a true triple bond is questioned. The analysis by Köppe and Schnöckel is based, inter alia, on the calculation of rigid coupling force constants. Nevertheless, since it is known for a long time that the use of rigid force constants as bond strength descriptors is by no means straightforward, we recomputed the rigid force constants for a model diboryne, applying different coordinate systems and compared the values with the relaxed force constants (generalized compliance constants, GCC). In contrast with the results by Schnöckel and Köppe, the true coupling between the boron-boron bond and the boron-carbon bond, that is, after the elimination of all numerical artifacts, is negligible (f BB/BC = -0.003).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grunenberg, J. (2015). III-defined concepts in chemistry: Rigid force constants vs. compliance constants as bond strength descriptors for the triple bond in diboryne. Chemical Science, 6(7), 4086–4088. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5sc01322d

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free