Sea urchin reproductive performance in a changing ocean: Poor males improve while good males worsen in response to ocean acidification

22Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Ocean acidification (OA) is predicted to be a major driver of ocean biodiversity change. At projected rates of change, sensitive marine taxa may not have time to adapt. Their persistence may depend on pre-existing inter-individual variability. We investigated individual male reproductive performance under present-day and OA conditions using two representative broadcast spawners, the sea urchins Lytechinus pictus and Heliocidaris erythrogramma. Under the non-competitive individual ejaculate scenario, we examined sperm functional parameters (e.g. swimming speed, motility) and their relationship with fertilization success under current and near-future OA conditions. Significant inter-individual differences in almost every parameter measured were identified. Importantly, we observed strong inverse relationships between individual fertilization success rate under current conditions and change in fertilization success under OA. Individuals with a high fertilization success under current conditions had reduced fertilization under OA, while individuals with a low fertilization success under current conditions improved. Change in fertilization success ranged from −67% to +114% across individuals. Our results demonstrate that while average population fertilization rates remain similar under OA and present-day conditions, the contribution by different males to the population significantly shifts, with implications for how selection will operate in a future ocean.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, K. E., Byrne, M., Deaker, D., Hird, C. M., Nielson, C., Wilson-McNeal, A., & Lewis, C. (2019). Sea urchin reproductive performance in a changing ocean: Poor males improve while good males worsen in response to ocean acidification. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286(1907). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0785

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free