The subjective rating scales for measurement of mental workload—thurstonian scaling

2Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Subjective rating scales for measuring work demands and individual capabilities to cope with work requirements were developed using the Thurstonian procedure. The scales measure six dimensions of mental workload: mental difficulties, feeling of responsibility, awareness of risk, interpersonal conflicts, monotony, and time pressure. Individual scale results make it possible to assess the level of mental workload understood as a relation between the subjective rating of work demands and individual capabilities in each of the six dimensions. Two versions of scales were prepared: classic and modified ones. To assess the level of reliability of the particular scales, 481 participants were examined twice at a 1-month interval. A procedure to prepare scales for the measurement of other dimensions of mental workload is also presented. © 1995 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dudek, B., & Koniarek, J. (1995). The subjective rating scales for measurement of mental workload—thurstonian scaling. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 1(2), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.1995.11076308

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free