Perspectives on Patient-Reported Outcome Data After Treatment Discontinuation in Cancer Clinical Trials

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) data are critical in understanding treatments from the patient perspective in cancer clinical trials. The potential benefits and methodological approaches to the collection of PRO data after treatment discontinuation (eg, because of progressive disease or unacceptable drug toxicity) are less clear. The purpose of this article is to describe the Food and Drug Administration's Oncology Center of Excellence and the Critical Path Institute cosponsored 2-hour virtual roundtable, held in 2020, to discuss this specific issue. Methods: We summarize key points from this discussion with 16 stakeholders representing academia, clinical practice, patients, international regulatory agencies, health technology assessment bodies/payers, industry, and PRO instrument development. Results: Stakeholders recognized that any PRO data collection after treatment discontinuation should have clearly defined objectives to ensure that data can be analyzed and reported. Conclusions: Data collection after discontinuation without a justification for its use wastes patients’ time and effort and is unethical.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

King-Kallimanis, B. L., Calvert, M., Cella, D., Cocks, K., Coens, C., Fairclough, D., … Wieseler, B. (2023). Perspectives on Patient-Reported Outcome Data After Treatment Discontinuation in Cancer Clinical Trials. Value in Health, 26(10), 1543–1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2023.06.019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free