Purpose: The aim of this paper is to show the ways of setting quality objectives, their attributes and the conditions under which they can perform a motivational function. Design/methodology/approach: Collecting relevant data, the authors used the results of previous research and theoretical assumptions concerning quality objectives. Subsequently, they carried out a survey and exemplification research based on participatory observations, document content analysis and interviews. Findings: Goals are set mainly by top management, but the communication process itself is insufficient; the needs of system users are not taken into account. In the opinion of the employees, quality objectives are measurable and objective, although not very ambitious. For quality objectives to fulfil a motivational function, they should be objective and measurable. Also, the allocation of tasks among employees needs to be fair. Furthermore, quality objectives have to play a greater role in remuneration systems. Originality/value: This paper is one of the first publications on the role and function of quality objectives. Its advantage is that it defines the conditions under which such objectives can have a motivational effect and encourage employees to pursue the improvement of their products and services.
CITATION STYLE
Bugdol, M., & Jedynak, P. (2022). Quality objectives in management systems – their attributes, establishment and motivational function. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 39(1), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-05-2020-0173
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.