Natural history, microbes and sequences: Shouldn't we look back again to organisms?

4Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The discussion on the existence of prokaryotic species is reviewed. The demonstration that several different mechanisms of genetic exchange and recombination exist has led some to a radical rejection of the possibility of bacterial species and, in general, the applicability of traditional classification categories to the prokaryotic domains. However, in spite of intense gene traffic, prokaryotic groups are not continuously variable but form discrete clusters of phenotypically coherent, well-defined, diagnosable groups of individual organisms. Molecularization of life sciences has led to biased approaches to the issue of the origins of biodiversity, which has resulted in the increasingly extended tendency to emphasize genes and sequences and not give proper attention to organismal biology. As argued here, molecular and organismal approaches that should be seen as complementary and not opposed views of biology. © 2011 Antonio Lazcano.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lazcano, A. (2011). Natural history, microbes and sequences: Shouldn’t we look back again to organisms? PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021334

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free