Antibiotic overuse for COVID-19: Are we adding insult to injury?

15Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this study, we described the proportion of COVID-19 patients started on antibiotics empirically and the work-ups performed to diagnose bacterial superinfection. We used a retrospective cohort study design involving medical records of symptomatic, hospitalized COVID-19 patients who were admitted to these centers. A total of 481 patients were included, with a median age of 41.0 years (interquartile range, 28-58.5 years). A total of 72.1% (N 5 347) of COVID-19 patients received antibiotics, either before or during admission. This is troublesome because none of the patients' bacterial culture or inflammatory markers, such as the erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein, were evaluated, and only 73 (15.2%) underwent radiological investigations. Therefore, national COVID-19 guidelines should emphasize the rational use of antibiotics for the treatment of COVID-19, a primarily viral disease. Integrating antimicrobial stewardship into the COVID-19 response and expanding microbiological capacities in low-income countries are indispensable. Otherwise, we risk one pandemic aggravating another.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abdela, S. G., Liesenborghs, L., Tadese, F., Abegaz, S. H., Bayuh, F. B., Asmamaw, E. A., … van Griensven, J. (2021). Antibiotic overuse for COVID-19: Are we adding insult to injury? American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 105(6), 1519–1520. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.21-0603

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free