Managing Coopetitive Tensions at the Working-group Level: The Rise of the Coopetitive Project Team

130Citations
Citations of this article
178Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

This study seeks to provide insights into the management of coopetitive tensions at the working-group level. We theoretically discuss the principles of separation and integration and a combination of both to manage coopetitive tensions at this level. An in-depth case study of a space programme conducted by two competitors - Astrium and Thales Alenia Space - was conducted. At the organizational level, according to the separation principle, we found that the coopetitors implemented a Coopetitive Project Team separated from the rest of their organization. At the individual level, according to the integration principle, we evidenced that project managers internalize the coopetitive paradox. At the working-group level, we revealed a new principle, that of co-management. The co-management principle, in the case of dyadic coopetition, relies on the implementation of a dual, equally shared governance structure and a dual management committee. To efficiently manage coopetitive tensions, firms are combining the separation principle at the organizational level, the co-management principle at the working-group level and the integration principle at the individual level. British Journal of Management

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Le Roy, F., & Fernandez, A. S. (2015). Managing Coopetitive Tensions at the Working-group Level: The Rise of the Coopetitive Project Team. British Journal of Management, 26(4), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12095

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free