Effect of antemortem feeding regimes on bacterial numbers in the stomachs and ceca of pigs

12Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Three groups, each of 45 pigs, were either not fasted, fasted for 15 h during lairage at the abattoir, or fasted for 15 h before dispatch from the piggery to the abattoir. Three subgroups, each of 15 pigs from each group, were held at the abattoir for additional times of either 0 to 1 h, 2 to 3 h, or 4 to 5 h. Immediately after slaughter, stomach and cecal contents were collected for pH measurement and enumeration of coliforms, Escherichia coli biotype I and lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Stomach pH changed from 4.1 to 3.1 as additional abattoir holding time increased from 0 to 1 h to 4 to 5 h but was unaffected by feed withdrawal (mean pH, 3.5). Cecal pH (range 6.4 to 7.2) increased in response to both treatments. Coliform and E. coli biotype 1 numbers in the stomach, means 4.6 and 4.5 log CFU/g, respectively, were not affected by feed withdrawal but decreased 0.8 log units as additional abattoir holding time increased from 0 to 1 to 4 to 5 h. LAB in the stomach decreased in response to both feed withdrawal and holding at the abattoir. Cecal numbers of coliforms and E. coli biotype 1 increased 0.8 and 1.0 log units to 7.8 and 7.6 log CFU/g, respectively, as a result of feed withdrawal, and 0.6 log units to 7.6 and 7.5 log CFU/g, respectively, as additional abattoir holding time increased to 4 to 5 h. The LAB in the cecum (mean 9.4 log CFU/g) increased slightly with increasing abattoir holding time. In the event of release of stomach or cecal contents onto the meat during carcass dressing, larger numbers of E. coli per g would be released from the ceca and fewer per g from the stomachs of pigs that have had feed withdrawn as compared to pigs not subjected to feed withdrawal.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nattress, F. M., & Murray, A. C. (2000). Effect of antemortem feeding regimes on bacterial numbers in the stomachs and ceca of pigs. Journal of Food Protection, 63(9), 1253–1257. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-63.9.1253

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free