Write to Read in Two Different Practices: Literacy versus Technology in Focus

  • Damber U
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Literacy acquisition by using computers and computer tablets is rapidly gaining ground in Swedish classrooms. This article explores the hypothesis that computer-writing vitalizes the learning of literacy, in comparison with approaches using books and pencils. The results of two separate studies in two different settings where prewriting and writing were used to enhance literacy development will be described and discussed. The results of a recent study of classrooms where computers were used will be compared with an older study where students used pencils and paper for writing. The results indicated that the nature of the literacy practice was strongly linked to the teacher's conceptions of literacy and learning. The teachers' choices of computers or pencils as tools for writing do, however, not seem to influence the processes of writing in the classrooms. How writing was enacted in the classrooms and the potential to further development of the literacy practices, were linked to teacher knowledge and the teacher's conception of literacy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Damber, U. (2013). Write to Read in Two Different Practices: Literacy versus Technology in Focus. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v2n2p96

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free