Increased coronary intervention rate among diabetic patients with poor glycaemic control: A cross-sectional study

3Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The relationship between glycaemic control and coronary artery disease (CAD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is controversial. In the current cross-sectional study, we addressed the relationship between Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values and the need for revascularization among diabetic patients undergoing coronary angiography. A total of 301 consecutive patients with known T2DM (age 6i.8±io.1 years, 46.2 % women) requiring coronary angiography due to CAD symptoms were included. T2DM patients were categorized into two groups based on their HbAic values: 93 (30.9%) diabetics with good glycaemic control (HbA1c<7 %), and 208 (69.1%) diabetics with poor glycaemic control (HbA1c>7 %). A total of 123 patients (40.9%) required revascularization. The revascularization rate was 28.0% among T2DM patients with good glycaemic control and 46.6% among T2DM patients with poor glycaemic control, respectively (ρ=0.002). In a logistic regression analysis, the need for revascularization was predicted by poor glycaemic control (Odds Ratio [OR] 2.26, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.32-3.82; ρ=0.003) adjusted for age, gender, Body-Mass-Index and diabetes duration. Moreover, there was a linear relationship between HbAic values and number of affected coronary arteries (r= 0.169; ρ=0.003). Our data suggest that there is a close association between poor glycaemic control and increased revascularization rate in T2DM, which should be considered in primary and secondary prevention models. © 2014 Association of Basic Medical Sciences of FB&H.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Çetin, S., Öztürk, M. A., Barindik, N., Ïmren, E., & Peker, Y. (2014). Increased coronary intervention rate among diabetic patients with poor glycaemic control: A cross-sectional study. Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences, 14(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2014.2286

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free