The influence of ammonia, biogenic amines and γ-aminobutyric acid on grass silage intake in sheep

  • Van Os M
  • Jailler M
  • Dulphy J
16Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We investigated whether biogenic amines alone, or a combination of NH 3 , amines and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) influenced grass-silage intake, intake behaviour and rumen liquid content in sheep. Three diets were studied: a grass silage preserved with formic acid (4 litres/tonne) (FAS), FAS with 4·9 g amines/kg DM added (FAS+A), and FAS supplemented with a combination of N-components at the following concentrations: 2·7 g amines, 3·0 g NH 3 and 5·0 g GABA/kg DM (FAS+C). The diets were offered ad libitum , once daily to six rumen-cannulated Texel wethers in a crossover design. Daily DM intake (DMI; g DM/d) tended to be influenced by diet ( P = 0·08). The DMI of FAS+A was similar to that of FAS alone, whereas that of FAS+C tended to be higher. The mean rate of ingestion (g DM/min) over all feeding bouts tended to be the lowest for FAS+A ( P = 0·06). No differences were found among the diets concerning intake behaviour during the principal meal. Average intake rate of the small meals tended to be the lowest for FAS+A ( P = 0·06). Although rumen NH 3 concentration was higher (P<0·05) after the principal meal, rumen pH, osmolality, rumen pool size and liquid content were not significantly altered by adding amines or the mixture of N-components to FAS. We conclude that biogenic amines or N-containing products of protein fermentation in concentrations normally found in poor-quality silages do not reduce the intake of well-preserved formic acid-treated silage. A direct effect on chemostatic regulation of intake was not observed, but a slight negative effect on silage palatability cannot be excluded.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Os, M., Jailler, M., & Dulphy, J. P. (1996). The influence of ammonia, biogenic amines and γ-aminobutyric acid on grass silage intake in sheep. British Journal of Nutrition, 76(3), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19960041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free