Abstract
Background: Abdominal surgery is common and is associated with severe postoperative pain. The transverse abdominal plane (TAP) block is considered an effective means for pain control in such cases. The quadratus lumborum (QL) block is another option for the management of postoperative pain. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis and thereby evaluate the efficacy and safety of QL blocks and TAP blocks for pain management after abdominal surgery. Methods: We comprehensively searched PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and CNKI for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared QL blocks and TAP blocks for pain management in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. All of the data were screened and evaluated by two researchers. RevMan5.3 was adopted for the meta-analysis. Results: A total of 8 RCTs involving 564 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to postoperative pain scores at 2 h (standardized mean difference [Std.MD] =-1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] =-2.63 to-0.89; p
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Liu, X., Song, T., Chen, X., Zhang, J., Shan, C., Chang, L., & Xu, H. (2020, March 2). Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiology. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-00967-2
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.