The relative impact of baryons and cluster shape on weak lensing mass estimates of galaxy clusters

28Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Weak gravitational lensing depends on the integrated mass along the line of sight. Baryons contribute to the mass distribution of galaxy clusters and the resulting mass estimates from lensing analysis. We use the cosmo-OWLS suite of hydrodynamic simulations to investigate the impact of baryonic processes on the bias and scatter of weak lensing mass estimates of clusters. These estimates are obtained by fitting NFW profiles to mock data using Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. In particular, we examine the difference in estimates between dark matter-only runs and those including various prescriptions for baryonic physics. We find no significant difference in themass bias when baryonic physics is included, though the overall mass estimates are suppressed when feedback from active galactic nucleus is included. For lowest-mass systems for which a reliable mass can be obtained (M200 ≈ 2 × 1014 M⊙), we find a bias of ≈ 10 per cent. The magnitude of the bias tends to decrease for higher mass clusters, consistent with no bias for the most massive clusters which have masses comparable to those found in the CLASH and HFF samples. For the lowest mass clusters, the mass bias is particularly sensitive to the fit radii and the limits placed on the concentration prior, rendering reliable mass estimates difficult. The scatter in mass estimates between the dark matter-only and the various baryonic runs is less than between different projections of individual clusters, highlighting the importance of triaxiality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, B. E., Le Brun, A. M. C., Haq, M. E., Deering, N. J., King, L. J., Applegate, D., & McCarthy, I. G. (2018). The relative impact of baryons and cluster shape on weak lensing mass estimates of galaxy clusters. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 479(1), 890–899. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1377

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free