Results of video-assisted technologies in colorectal surgery

  • Shevchenko Y
  • Karpov O
  • Vetshev P
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AIM: To analyze immediate outcomes of 286 laparoscopic and robot-assisted interventions on the colon and rectum.MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 256 (89.51%) laparoscopic and 30 (10.49%) robot-assisted procedures. 233 (81.46%) operations were performed for rectum and colon cancer. Postoperative complications after colon cancer surgery were revealed in 11.11%, including anastomosis failure in 2.08% of cases. Postoperative complications after rectal cancer surgery occurred in 32.58% of cases including anastomosis failure after anterior rectectomy in 11.67%.CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted surgery is not advisable for colon diseases according to price-effectiveness ratio due to available laparoscopic approach. Preventive intestinal stoma in endoscopic low and ultra-low anterior rectal resection allows you to avoid clinically significant inconsistency of colorectal anastomosis. Laparoscopic procedure should be performed with Contour stitching-cutting device in low and ultra-low anterior rectal resection if there is technical complexity of one-stage rectum intersection below the tumor. Robot-assisted operations for rectal cancer have advantages due to three-dimensional imaging and better orientation, greater freedom of manipulation in confined spaces, and simplicity of lymphadenectomy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shevchenko, Yu. L., Karpov, O. E., Vetshev, P. S., Maksimenkov, A. V., Stepanyuk, I. V., Stoyko, Yu. M., … Kolozyan, D. A. (2018). Results of video-assisted technologies in colorectal surgery. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal Im. N.I. Pirogova, (2), 66. https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2018266-73

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free