Carbon footprint impact of the choice of inhalers for asthma and COPD

214Citations
Citations of this article
235Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the 1990s, metered dose inhalers (MDIs) containing chlorofluorocarbons were replaced with dry-powder inhalers (DPIs) and MDIs containing hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). While HFCs are not ozone depleting, they are potent greenhouse gases. Annual carbon footprint (CO 2 e), per patient were 17 kg for Relvar-Ellipta/Ventolin-Accuhaler; and 439 kg for Seretide-Evohaler/Ventolin-Evohaler. In 2017, 70% of all inhalers sold in England were MDI, versus 13% in Sweden. Applying the Swedish DPI and MDI distribution to England would result in an annual reduction of 550 kt CO 2 e. The lower carbon footprint of DPIs should be considered alongside other factors when choosing inhalation devices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Janson, C., Henderson, R., Löfdahl, M., Hedberg, M., Sharma, R., & Wilkinson, A. J. K. (2020). Carbon footprint impact of the choice of inhalers for asthma and COPD. Thorax, 75(1), 82–84. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-213744

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free