Growth performance of all-female and mixed-sex common carp Cyprinus Carpio L. populations in the central Europe climatic conditions

37Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The results of a 4-yr study focused on comparing growth performance in all-female and mixed-sex populations of common carp are presented. All-female and mixed-sex populations of purebred Northern mirror carp (M72) and scaly crossbreds of female Ropsha (ROP) and male/neomale M72 carp (ROP × M72) were used for this experiment. Average weight and survival after each growing season and slaughtering value after the third and fourth year of the study were measured. While after 8 wk of rearing no differences between all-female and mixed-sex populations were found, the 1-yr-old all-female mirror carp population (M72) gained 29.7% more weight (P <0.0001) than the mixed-sex (68.5 ± 15.8 g against 52.8 ± 13.9 g; mean ± S.D.) population. After the second, third and fourth year of rearing, live weight was 9.5% (P = 0.0062) and 6.8% (P = 0.0229) and insignificantly 5.1% higher, respectively, in the all-female population. There was no significant difference, even after the fourth growing season, in live weight between all-females and bisexual scaly crossbreds (2,192 g ± 478.3 and 2,206 g ± 484.5, respectively). The percentage of the main edible parts (processed body, filleting yield) was significantly higher in both mirror and scaly, all-female populations at 3 yr of age but not significantly different in 4-yr-old fish. No distinct differences in survival and body shape of all-female and bisexual populations were found. The potential of all-female populations for commercial production is discussed. © Copyright by the World Aquaculture Society 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kocour, M., Linhart, O., Gela, D., & Rodina, M. (2005). Growth performance of all-female and mixed-sex common carp Cyprinus Carpio L. populations in the central Europe climatic conditions. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 36(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2005.tb00136.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free