Abstract
The distinction between achievements and accomplishments is known to be an empirically important but subtle one. It is argued here to depend on the atomicity (rather than punctuality) of events, and to be strongly related to incrementality (i.e., to event-object mapping functions). A computational treatment of incrementality and atomicity is discussed in the paper, and a number of related empirical problems considered, notably lexical polysemy in verb - argument relationships.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Caudal, P. (1999). Computational lexical semantics, incrementality, and the so-called punctuality of events. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol. 1999-June, pp. 497–504). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/1034678.1034753
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.