Toward protein structure in situ: Comparison of two bifunctional rhodamine adducts of troponin C

11Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

As part of a program to develop methods for determining protein structure in situ, sTnC was labeled with a bifunctional rhodamine (BR or BSR), cross-linking residues 56 and 63 of its C-helix. NMR spectroscopy of the N-terminal domain of BSR-labeled sTnC in complex with Ca2+ and the troponin I switch peptide (residues 115-131) showed that BSR labeling does not significantly affect the secondary structure of the protein or its dynamics in solution. BR-labeling was previously shown to have no effect on the solution structure of this complex. Isometric force generation in isolated demembranated fibers from rabbit psoas muscle into which BR- or BSR-labeled sTnC had been exchanged showed reduced Ca2+-sensitivity, and this effect was larger with the BSR label. The orientation of rhodamine dipoles with respect to the fiber axis was determined by polarized fluorescence. The mean orientations of the BR and BSR dipoles were almost identical in relaxed muscle, suggesting that both probes accurately report the orientation of the C-helix to which they are attached. The BSR dipole had smaller orientational dispersion, consistent with less flexible linkers between the rhodamine dipole and cysteine-reactive groups. © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Julien, O., Sun, Y. B., Knowles, A. C., Brandmeier, B. D., Dale, R. E., Trentham, D. R., … Irving, M. (2007). Toward protein structure in situ: Comparison of two bifunctional rhodamine adducts of troponin C. Biophysical Journal, 93(3), 1008–1020. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.103879

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free