A single-day paradigm of self-regulated human cocaine administration

10Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Prior work by our group has shown the feasibility, safety, and validity of a multi-day, multi-dose paradigm of self-regulated cocaine administration in humans. The current work sought to consolidate these methods in a single-day design focused on reducing logistical complexity, decreasing research burden to human subjects, and increasing suitability for medication development designs. Methods: Eleven experienced cocaine users participated in a 6-hour, single-day design, consisting of one safety/eligibility and three experimental cocaine periods (during which subjects were allowed to self-administer 8, 16, and 32 mg/70 kg cocaine doses under a fixed-ratio 1:5 minute timeout schedule). Changes in cocaine-induced cardiovascular response, self-administration behavior, and subjective effects were assessed. Results: Procedures were well tolerated by participants, and no significant adverse events were noted. Significant (p < 0.05), changes in measures of cocaine self-administration (e.g., responses, infusions, interinfusion intervals, consumption, and plasma levels), cardiovascular response (HR), and subjective effects (high) were observed. In contrast, cocaine-induced increases in other vital signs (e.g., SBP, DBP) and subjective effect measures (e.g., paranoia) did not differ between doses. Conclusions: These data support the safety, tolerability and validity of our single-day design. Depending on the application, such methods may afford advantages for assessing the self-regulation of cocaine administration behavior in humans (e.g., including medication development designs). © 2012 Elsevier Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matuskey, D., Pittman, B., Chen, J. I., Wanyiri, J., Nadim, H., Jatlow, P., … Malison, R. T. (2012). A single-day paradigm of self-regulated human cocaine administration. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 103(1), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2012.08.009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free