Assessing classroom and laboratory spread of COVID-19 in a university after elimination of physical distancing

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess COVID-19 classroom transmission in the university setting when physical distancing was eliminated. Data was collected in fall 2021 at a private university. Universal masking, robust contact tracing, vaccination requirement, and enforced testing were in place. Exposures were classified as classroom versus non-classroom. ANOVA and chi-squared tests were used to identify significant relationships between predictors and COVID-19 test result. Logistic regression was conducted to investigate the relationship between exposure type and test result. A total of 162 student cases were identified with 1,658 associated close contacts. One-Third of contacts (31.1%, n = 516) only had a non-classroom exposure, 63.8% (n = 1,057) only had a classroom exposure, and 5.1% (n = 85) had both. Close contacts were significantly more likely to test positive if they had a non-classroom exposure (60 of 601; 10.0%) compared to a classroom exposure (1 of 1057; 0.1%) (OR 58.8, CI 18.5 333.3, p 0.001). Removing physical distancing in classrooms that had universal masking did not result in high rates of COVID-19 transmission. This has policy implications because eliminating physical distancing does not greatly increase transmission risk when universal masking is in place.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rebmann, T., Loux, T. M., Gomel, A., Lugo, K. A., Bafageeh, F., Elkins, H., & Arnold, L. D. (2023). Assessing classroom and laboratory spread of COVID-19 in a university after elimination of physical distancing. PLoS ONE, 18(3 March). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283050

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free