Optimal rocuronium dose for intubation during inhalation induction with sevoflurane in children

52Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. We studied 120 children aged 2-7 yr in a prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded fashion to define the optimal rocuronium dose which provides a 95% probability of acceptable intubation conditions (ED95TI) during inhalation induction with sevoflurane. Methods. After inhalation induction with 8% sevoflurane in 60% nitrous oxide and 40% oxygen, and loss of the eyelash reflex, we administered rocuronium (0.1, 0.15, 0.22, 0.3, or 0.6 mg kg-1) or placebo. We quantified neuromuscular function by stimulation of the ulnar nerve at 0.1 Hz to produce contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle using accelerometry. Intubation conditions were assessed 2 min after test drug injection. The optimal rocuronium dose was defined as the lowest dose, which allowed acceptable intubation conditions in 95% of children (ED95TI). Results. Two minutes after injection of placebo or rocuronium, intubation conditions were acceptable in 35, 45, 80, 90, 95, and 100% of children, respectively. Rocuronium 0.07 [CI 0.02-0.11], 0.24 [0.19-0.31], and 0.29 [0.23-0.38] mg kg-1 provided 50, 90, and 95% probability of acceptable intubating conditions. When thumb acceleration was depressed by 50% or more, intubating conditions were considered acceptable in 97% of children. Recovery of the train-of-tour ratio to 0.8 averaged 12 (7), 16 (7), 24 (7), 24 (8), and 50 (22) min after the respective dose of rocuronium. Conclusions. During inhalation induction with 8% sevoflurane in 60% nitrous oxide, rocuronium 0.29 mg kg-1 (ED95) optimizes intubation conditions for surgery of short duration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eikermann, M., Hunkemöller, I., Peine, L., Armbruster, W., Stegen, B., Hüsing, J., & Peters, J. (2002). Optimal rocuronium dose for intubation during inhalation induction with sevoflurane in children. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 89(2), 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aef177

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free