Do We Have Enough Information? Assessing AI Clinical Decision Support Systems for Implementation in Primary Care

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This environmental scan examined commercially available AI clinical decision support solutions (AI-CDSS) across three domains: knowledge base, AI methodology, and privacy. Over half of vendors disclosed some information on their knowledge base, yet few demonstrated rigorous appraisal or alignment with Quality Standards or other evidence-based guidelines. Transparency on AI methods was limited as most cited proprietary algorithms but rarely described training data. Privacy information was more commonly reported but often high-level, with limited detail on compliance, storage location, or restrictions on secondary use. These gaps reveal the obstacles facing decision makers: without standardized, transparent information, organizations and governments cannot reliably evaluate AI-CDSS or provide the support clinicians need for responsible and informed implementation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coderre-Ball, A., Ravi Chandran, A., Gnanapragasam, V., Ataman, R., Baser, K., & Scott-Meuser, P. (2026). Do We Have Enough Information? Assessing AI Clinical Decision Support Systems for Implementation in Primary Care. In Studies in Health Technology and Informatics (Vol. 334, pp. 73–77). IOS Press BV. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI260019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free