Evidence that myosin does not contribute to force production in chromosome movement

90Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Antibody against cytoplasmic myosin, when microinjected into actively dividing cells, provides a physiological test for the role of actin and myosin in chromosome movement. Anti-Asterias egg myosin, characterized by Mabuchi and Okuno (1977, J. Cell Biol., 74:251), completely and specifically inhibits the actin activated Mg++-ATPase of myosin in vitro and, when microinjected, inhibits cytokinesis in vivo. Here, we demonstrate that microinjected antibody has no observable effect on the rate or extent of anaphase chromosome movements. Neither central spindle elongation nor chromosomal fiber shortening is affected by doses up to eightfold higher than those required to uniformly inhibit cytokinesis in all injected cells. We calculate that such doses are sufficient to completely inhibit myosin ATPase activity in these cells. Cells injected with buffer alone, with myosin-absorbed antibody, or with nonimmune yglobulin, proceed normally through both mitosis and cytokinesis. Control y-globulin, labeled with fluorescein, diffuses to homogeneity throughout the cytoplasm in 2-4 rain and remains uniformly distributed. Antibody is not excluded from the spindle region. Prometaphase chromosome movements, fertilization, pronuclear migration, and pronuclear fusion are also unaffected by microinjected antimyosin. These experiments demonstrate that antimyosin blocks the actomyosin interaction thought to be responsible for force production in cytokinesis but has no effect on mitotic or meiotic chromosome motion. They provide direct physiological evidence that myosin is not involved in force production for chromosome movement. © 1982, Rockefeller University Press., All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kiehart, D. P., Mabuchi, I., & Inoué, S. (1982). Evidence that myosin does not contribute to force production in chromosome movement. Journal of Cell Biology, 94(1), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.94.1.165

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free