Combining quantitative and qualitative research to engage stakeholders in developing quality indicators in general practice.

8Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In 2000, the Newcastle Institute of Public Health (NIPH) undertook a project that aimed to review, identify and where necessary, develop a range of indicators of quality service provision in general practice. We describe the way in which quantitative and qualitative research methods (including a Delphi style survey) were combined to investigate consensus amongst stakeholders in defining quality indicators. Over 500 general practice stakeholders were consulted. They included general practitioners (GPs) and their representative groups, academics, policy makers, and consumers. Several important lessons were learnt from the process, including the importance of involving a broad representative group of stakeholders, informing workshop participants in advance, providing adequate response times for the Delphi surveys and using videoconferencing technologies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jeacocke, D., Heller, R., Smith, J., Anthony, D., Williams, J. S., & Dugdale, A. (2002). Combining quantitative and qualitative research to engage stakeholders in developing quality indicators in general practice. Australian Health Review : A Publication of the Australian Hospital Association, 25(4), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH020012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free