Choosing Wisely and reducing the simultaneous ordering of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein testing in a large safety net system

10Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) are commonly used inflammatory markers. C-reactive protein is more sensitive and specific for monitoring acute inflammation. However, it is commonly co-ordered with ESR despite recommendations against this. Our objective was to reduce unnecessary ESR orders and ESR/CRP co-ordering rates across a large safety net health system. Methods: This was a quality improvement project that used a quasi-experimental pre- and postintervention interrupted time-series regression analysis. Patients with a positive COVID-19 test were excluded. We designed a nonintrusive, normative nudge within the ESR order that recommended against co-ordering ESR and CRP. In addition, a best practice advisory triggered when ESR and CRP were simultaneously ordered. The outcome measures were ESR order rates per 1000 patient days in the inpatient setting and per 1000 patient encounters in the outpatient setting, as well as ESR/CRP co-ordering rates. Results: Inpatient ESR orders decreased from 12.02 preintervention to 5.61 per 1000 patient days (-53.3%, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cho, H. J., Talledo, J., Alaiev, D., Israilov, S., Chandra, K., Tsega, S., … Krouss, M. (2023). Choosing Wisely and reducing the simultaneous ordering of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein testing in a large safety net system. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 160(6), 585–592. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqad093

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free