Effect of thickness on the degree of conversion, monomer elution, depth of cure and cytotoxicity of bulk-fill composites

17Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Today, bulk-fill composites are used as a single layer with a thickness of up to 4-5 mm. However, is proper polymerization achieved with this increased thickness? Methods: This study was designed to investigate the effect of thickness on the degree of conversion (DC) (n = 6), the elution of monomers (n = 6), depth of cure (DoC) (n = 10) and cytotoxicity (n = 6) of the bulk-fill composites SDR Flow Plus (SDR), SonicFill2 SingleFill (SF) and ACTIVA Bioactive Restorative (ACT) in comparison to the conventional G-aenial Posterior (GC). Two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the interaction between materials and surfaces, and one‐way ANOVA and Tukey tests were used to compare the degree of conversion, monomer elution and cytotoxicity values (P < 0.05). Results: The highest DC was found at the top surface of SDR, while the lowest DC was found at SF. The V2 mm/V0 mm DoC ratios of the composites except ACTs were appropriate according to the threshold. None of the composites were cytotoxic on day 1. Conclusion: In bulk-fill composites, DC decreased and monomer elution increased with increasing depth. The V4 mm/V0 mm ratios of all bulk-fill groups were not appropriate. Additionally, only ACTs had a cell viability of <70% on day 7.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yıldırım, Z. S., Eyiler, E., & Kürklü, Z. G. B. (2023). Effect of thickness on the degree of conversion, monomer elution, depth of cure and cytotoxicity of bulk-fill composites. Journal of Oral Science, 65(2), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.22-0374

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free