Corrigendum to "efficacy Comparison of Five Different Acupuncture Methods on Pain, Stiffness, and Function in Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Network Meta-Analysis"

1Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the article titled "Efficacy Comparison of Five Different Acupuncture Methods on Pain, Stiffness, and Function in Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Network Meta-Analysis" [1], there were missing inclusion criteria in the "2. Materials and Methods" of Page 2, where "Interventions were compared between commonmanual acupuncture, electro-acupuncture, fire needle, warmneedle, placebo, shamneedle, or education" should be corrected to "Interventions included common manual acupuncture, electro-acupuncture, fire needle, or warm needle. Comparators were any of the above described interventions compared with each other, or placebo, waiting list control (including no intervention), sham needle, or education. There was no language restriction in search strategy." Additionally, there were errors in the typesetting and description in Table 1. The corrected table is shown below.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, S., Xie, P., Liang, Z., Huang, W., Huang, Z., Ou, J., … Chai, S. (2019). Corrigendum to “efficacy Comparison of Five Different Acupuncture Methods on Pain, Stiffness, and Function in Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Network Meta-Analysis.” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3713197

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free