One- and Two-Year Efficacy of Resin Infiltration and Remineralization for the Treatment of Initial Proximal Caries

Abstract

Proximal caries presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Recent understanding of the etiology and pathology of dental caries has led to the adoption of non-invasive and/or minimally invasive approaches in the early stages of caries lesions. This clinical study aimed to compare the efficacy of resin infiltration and remineralization in the treatment of initial proximal caries lesions over a 1- and 2-year follow-up period. The study involved 47 patients aged between 18 and 38 years. Patients were clinically examined and underwent bitewing radiography to detect at least three initial proximal caries lesions. Each detected lesion (180 in total) was randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: (1) resin infiltration with Icon Proximal Infiltrant (DMG); (2) remineralization with Clinpro White Varnish (3M); and (3) a control group receiving no treatment. One year after treatment, caries progression was found in 30 lesions (16.6%) with the following distribution across the three treatment groups: 2/60 (3%) in the infiltration group; 11/60 (18%) in the remineralization group; 17/60 (28.30%) in the no treatment control group with a significant statistical difference between the groups (p = 0.001). In terms of lesion depth, 12 (11%) out of 106 E2 lesions progressed and 18 out of 74 (24%) D1 lesions progressed, with a significant difference (p = 0.037). Two years after treatment, five new lesions were found to have progressed (one E2 and four D1), distributed as follows: 0% in the infiltration group, 3.6% in the remineralization group, and 5% in the control group. In conclusion, resin infiltration exhibited the lowest percentage of progressed lesions and could be considered a reliable, non-invasive treatment for initial proximal caries.