Heavy Metal and Trace Metal Analysis in Soil by Sequential Extraction: A Review of Procedures

  • Zimmerman A
  • Weindorf D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
541Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Quantification of heavy and trace metal contamination in soil can be arduous, requiring the use of lengthy and intricate extraction procedures which may or may not give reliable results. Of the many procedures in publication, some are designed to operate within specific parameters while others are designed for more broad application. Most procedures have been modified since their inception which creates ambiguity as to which procedure is most acceptable in a given situation. For this study, the Tessier, Community Bureau of Reference (BCR), Short, Galán, and Geological Society of Canada (GCS) procedures were examined to clarify benefits and limitations of each. Modifications of the Tessier, BCR, and GCS procedures were also examined. The efficacy of these procedures is addressed by looking at the soils used in each procedure, the limitations, applications, and future of sequential extraction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zimmerman, A. J., & Weindorf, D. C. (2010). Heavy Metal and Trace Metal Analysis in Soil by Sequential Extraction: A Review of Procedures. International Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2010, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/387803

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free