Daclizumab versus rabbit antithymocyte globulin in high-risk renal transplants: Five-year follow-up of a randomized study

57Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We previously reported a randomized controlled trial in which 227 de novo deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients were randomized to rabbit antithymocyte (rATG, Thymoglobulin) or daclizumab if they were considered to be at high immunological risk, defined as high panel reactive antibodies (PRA), loss of a first kidney graft through rejection within 2 years of transplantation, or third or fourth transplantation. Patients treated with rATG had lower incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and steroid-resistant rejection at 1 year. Patients were followed to 5 years posttransplant in an observational study; findings are described here. Treatment with rATG was associated with a lower rate of BPAR at 5 years (14.2% vs. 26.0% with daclizumab; p-=-0.035). Only one rATG-treated patient (0.9%) and one daclizumab-treated patient (1.0%) developed BPAR after 1 year. Five-year graft and patient survival rates, and renal function, were similar between the two groups. Overall graft survival at 5 years was significantly higher in patients without BPAR (81.0% vs. 54.8%; p-

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hellemans, R., Hazzan, M., Durand, D., Mourad, G., Lang, P., Kessler, M., … Abramowicz, D. (2015). Daclizumab versus rabbit antithymocyte globulin in high-risk renal transplants: Five-year follow-up of a randomized study. American Journal of Transplantation, 15(7), 1923–1932. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.13191

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free