A study of the Unna Boot compared with the elastic bandage in venous ulcers: A randomized clinical trial

24Citations
Citations of this article
99Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: to analyze the process of tissue repair in patients with venous ulcers using inelastic compression therapy (the Unna Boot), in comparison with the use of the elastic bandage. Method: a controlled randomized clinical trial in which the patients (n=18) were allocated to two groups, those who used the Unna Boot (group B) and those who used the elastic bandage (group A). The study’s follow-up period was 13 weeks. Results: a significant reduction took place, at the level of 5%, in the area, in square centimeters, of the ulcers of group B (p<0.0001) throughout the treatment, and there was a tendency of group A for reduction in the area of the ulcer, in centimeters squared (p=0.06), only after the fifth week. Conclusion: the treatment with the Unna Boot presented better results in venous ulcers with areas over 10cm2, and the elastic bandage with Petrolatum® gauze in venous ulcers below 10cm2. Brazilian Clinical Trials Register: Trial (req: 195) and WHO UTN U1111-1122-5489.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Abreu, A. M., & de Oliveira, B. G. R. B. (2015). A study of the Unna Boot compared with the elastic bandage in venous ulcers: A randomized clinical trial. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 23(4), 571–577. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.0373.2590

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free