Citrus tree removal method does not affect performance of reset trees

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Florida citrus groves of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis), tangerines (Citrus reticulata), and grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) experience an annual tree loss of 3% to 4% due to various causes of tree decline. Commonly used tree removal methods in Florida include "pushing," which lifts most of the root system completely out of the soil, or "clipping," which shears the tree off above the soil line leaving the tree stump and root system in place. Several operational and economic advantages and disadvantages exist for both tree removal systems. There are also potential problems with citrus resets that can occur due to foot rot (Phytophthora nicotianae) and citrus nematodes (Tylenchulus semipenetrans) that remain in the soil after tree removal. To investigate reset tree performance after "pushing" versus "clipping," a study was conducted in three groves representative of three production regions in Florida to compare the impact of tree removal method on the pest/pathogen status and growth of resets over a period of 4 years. Based on the findings, tree removal by "pushing" or "clipping" appears to have minimal effect on subsequent pest and pathogen status and performance of citrus resets. Therefore, the method of tree removal should depend primarily on operational and economic considerations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Futch, S. H., Graham, J. H., & Duncan, L. W. (2008). Citrus tree removal method does not affect performance of reset trees. HortTechnology, 18(4), 559–562. https://doi.org/10.21273/horttech.18.4.559

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free