Time-saving effects using helicopter transportation: Comparison to a ground transportation time predicted using a social navigation software

5Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Previous comparison studies regarding 2 types of transportation, helicopter (HEMS) versus ground emergency medical services (GEMS), have shown underlying heterogeneity as these options have completely different routes and consequent times with reference to one patient. To compare the 2 types of transportation on a case-by-case basis, we analyzed the retrospectively reviewed HEMS and predicted GEMS data using an open-source navigation software. Patients transferred by military HEMS from 2016 to 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. The HEMS records on the time of notification, injury point and destination address, and time required were reviewed. The GEMS data on distance and the predicted time required were acquired using open-source social navigation systems. Comparison analyses between the two types of transportation were conducted. Furthermore, linear logistic regression analyses were performed on the distance and time of the two options. A total of 183 patients were enrolled. There was no statistical difference (P=.3021) in the distance between the 2 types of transportation, and the HEMS time was significantly shorter than that of GEMS (61.31 vs 116.92 minutes, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jang, J. Y., Kwon, W. K., Roh, H., Moon, J. H., Hwang, J. S., Kim, Y. J., & Kim, J. H. (2021). Time-saving effects using helicopter transportation: Comparison to a ground transportation time predicted using a social navigation software. Medicine (United States), 100(27). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026569

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free